Categories
Uncategorized

Public Health Policy Position Paper and its Effect on Structural Racism

The writer of a position paper presents convincing evidence to support the stated pointof view while also addressing and arguing against the arguments that would…

The writer of a position paper presents convincing evidence to support the stated pointof view while also addressing and arguing against the arguments that would be presentedby the opposing side.This discussion should be framed from an academicperspective (i.e. science) and not based on ones personal opinion.
Identify a policy that you would like to see become law [but is not now a federal law or only inspecific states]. Write a position paper (around 5 pages in length) which develops your argumentfor legislation to make the policy a formal law. You have the freedom to identify a policy issuethat you feel is important and personally meaningful. This policy position paper should includethe following and follow the formatting indicated at the bottom:
State the policy, provide some background and identify 3 well-developed and convincingjustifications for why this policy should become law. (15 points)
Think about what comments or arguments the opposing side might use to refute each ofyour justifications listed above. Provide 3 rebuttal arguments to challenge their claimsone for each of the initial justifications.Rebuttal arguments should have 2 parts: a) Rebuttal – summary of what the opposingside might argue in refuting your justification; b) Counter claim- an argument thatdiscredits their claim. (21 points) State whether and how the policy would impact structural racism in the USA, i.e. wouldit lessen structural racism (be an anti-racist action), lead to more health inequities, or haveno impact. Provide a well-thought-out explanation. (6 points) At the end of your paper, provide a list of the references you used to help you substantiateyour position, using APA format. (3 point)
You must format your paper in the following manner**:
Policy: Specifically, and concretely state what the proposed law would beBackground: Provide a brief overview of the problem the policy would address and existing policy shortfalls
Justification 1:Rebuttal for Justification 1:Counter claim for Rebuttal 1:Justification 2:Rebuttal for Justification 2:Counter argument for Rebuttal 2:Justification 3:Rebuttal for Justification 3:Counter argument for Rebuttal 3:Effect on Structural Racism:
pdf of instructions is below

CLICK HERE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *